Bernie Sanders’ 1992 Cancer Registry Law: How much is breast cancer increasing in U.S. today?

The first piece of legislation that then- freshman Congressman Bernie Sanders drafted and  successfully passed, was The 1992 Cancer Registries Amendment Act.

But Bernie’s  law has not yet been implemented, thanks to 23 years of successful  stonewalling by the National Cancer Institute and  the Centers for Disease Control.

Sanders’ much-needed federal law  creates a uniform state-based  cancer  reporting system that includes all 50 state, the District of Columbia and   U.S. Territories, along with a centralized data bank within the federal Centers for Disease Control. The Sanders’ Registry can tell us how much breast cancer is increasing each year in younger women, for example,  and which age groups have the highest rates of breast cancer.  This is important information for those of us who want to find ways to stop breast cancer before it starts.

Image result for bernie sanders images

 

Why are our  federal cancer agencies continuing to block the U.S. public from knowing the extent of our current breast cancer epidemic?

Without Bernie’s  central cancer data bank, the U.S. public cannot track  how much breast cancer is increasing within different age groups or ethnic groups  and/or within different sections of the country throughout the U.S.   This is a ridiculous and unacceptable  situation.

Without such a central data base that the Sanders Law requires, the U.S. public continues to remain in the dark about our ongoing  breast cancer  epidemic

U.S. Breast Cancer Statistics 2015

The National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and many Big Pharma- sponsored breast cancer foundations. including the American Cancer Society and Susan G Komen for the Cure  want us to believe that breast cancer is a static situation. Each year they tell us the same thing: “One out of every 8 U.S. women can expect to develop breast cancer in her lifetime.”

This is a  fear-mongering and no-help  statistic. This is similar to saying the U.S. has an  annual programmed breast cancer hurricane and 260,000 women will again end up diagnosed with breast cancer by the end of the year… year after year.

Without knowing the  actual  number of women in the U.S. diagnosed with invasive breast cancer this year,  compared to last year and the year before that,  it is also difficult for Busting Breast Cancer and other prevention organizations to show how our programs or recommended lifestyle changes are able to change our current breast cancer statistics!

Fully implementing Bernie Sanders’ 1992 Cancer Registries Amendment Law will give us the standardized up-to-date national data we need to help stop breast  cancer before it starts.

Please contact your congressman/congresswoman and senators today.  Congressional members of all stripes should support the full implementation of Bernie Sanders’  1992   Cancer Registries Amendment Act.

Please help us STOP the Centers for Disease Control & the National Cancer Institute from continuing to stonewall Bernie Sanders’ 1992 Cancer Registries Amendment Act

It is THE LAW!!!!!  and it has been for 23 years now; but it must be fully implemented!

 Please Note: Since  the U.S. government  has not yet created the legally mandated  national  cancer registry, as legislated by Bernie Sanders’ 1992 law, the U.S. public now receives national cancer statistics from a private organization, North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, founded in 1987 and funded by the cancer  treatment industry, the American Cancer Society  and the Centers for Disease Control.

The data generated by the NAACCR is based on primary tumor information, not on the number of individuals diagnosed with cancer in any one year. This means U.S. cancer statistics cannot be compared to cancer statistics from other countries as the U.S. counts tumors, while other nations count people. This year the  NAACCR published  an annual report  to the nation  which gives us tumor data from 1975 to 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas Seyfried: Cancer can only develop in an acid body; cancer prevention is possible

 

Thomas Seyfried is an  award-winning biologist at Boston College. But I think he  needs to change his name.

He name should really be David, because  his new book stands up to  Goliath.. that booming multi-billion dollar cancer treatment industry.  Seyfried’s book, Cancer as a Metabolic Disease,  clearly says to our current cancer establishment: You  do not understand what is causing most cancer . Your theory underlying your treatment protocols are also wrong.  Cancer is not a genetic disease. No wonder death rates from metastatic breast cancer and other cancers have not changed in the past thirty years. Your research is looking down the wrong tunnel.

Sadly, our leading cancer centers and mainstream oncologists across the U.S. have invested so much money in their genetic theory of cancer, that they can’t turn back now. So they continue to tell us:
We really don’t know what  causes breast cancers; but when you develop this disease,  we are ready to offer you treatment…. that may or may not cure this  disease of unknown origins. 

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/417W6XsT9OL._SL160_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-dp,TopRight,12,-18_SH30_OU01_AA160_.jpg

Seyfried’s thesis is based on the Warburg Effect, a  theory of cancer awarded a Nobel Prize in 1931. Simply said, this metabolic theory of cancer shows how developing an inflamed acidic body  can gum up cell membranes,  causing them to stop breathing in enough oxygen to stay healthy.

To survive,  these gasping cells  morph into mindless anaerobic cells that begin to ferment. Now they no longer need oxygen to survive. Just like a compost heap, these cells  need an acid environment (think  glucose, sugar,  inflammation from chemical & animal  hormones & chronic stress)  to survive, thrive and  duplicate themselves mindlessly.   Presto…. tumors can now begin to form.

Instead of adopting Warburg’s metabolic theory,  the western main stream medical profession has chosen to believe in another  theory of  the cause of cancer…something called  the mutation theory.  So now we often hear doctors say:

“Gee we just don’t know exactly what has caused your healthy breast cells to spontaneously mutate and become  breast cancer cells. But we can try to  get rid of all of  those cells using surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy.  Hopefully our treatment will cure you of  this disease of unknown origins.”

An MD by the name of Georgia Ede,  who is also the  new psychiatrist at Smith College, heard Tom Seyfried describe the concept of cancer as a metabolic disease this past August.

Dr Ede has now done a great job of translating Seyfreid’s and Warburg’s  theories on the main cause of cancer  into  language that most of us should be able to follow pretty well.

To understand more about cancer as a metabolic disease, I recommend you read  Ede’s 4 part article.

Meanwhile, if you are trying to find ways to stop breast cancer before it can start, it is important to at least find out  if your body is currently acidic or alkaline.

Cancer, it turns out, is unable to grow in an alkaline environment!

Go buy a  package of pH strips and measure your first and second urine of the morning… or your saliva.  If you are measuring  anywhere between 6.5-8.0 …congratulations!!! You are doing something right.

A pH reading of 7.2 is the ideal.

If the pH strip measures lower than 6.5 most of the time,  your body is acidic. This means your body could be  fertile ground for cancer cells to thrive unless you start adding  much more alkaline foods ( greens,  avocados, sprouts, cucumbers)  and less acidic  foods (sugar based foods, white rice,  white bread, dead meat, dairy, coffee, alcohol, diet and sugar sodas) …to your daily diet.

Try reading Acid Alkaline Diet for Dummies and see if you can  change your diet enough for your urine or saliva to start measuring  between 6.5 and 8.0  on the pH scale at any point during the day.

Also check out this video on measuring your pH   and various other ways to make your body alkaline.

Good Luck everybody!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S

 

Angelina Jolie’s Breast Amputations: Not the only option

Increasing vitamin D3 & avoiding birth control drugs can also  block breast cancer

As folksinger Melissa Etheridge recently said when asked about actress Angelina Jolie’s decision to have both of her healthy breasts amputated, “I wouldn’t call it the brave choice. I actually think it’s the most fearful choice you can make when confronting anything with cancer.”

Etheridge, like Jolie, was born with a defective “cancer fix-it” gene. Unlike Jolie, however, Etheridge was actually diagnosed with breast cancer nine years ago. However, the singer, now cancer-free,  is among an increasing number of women who understand there are alternatives to the poison, burn and cut prevention options that traditional western medicine continues to offer women as their best choices when confronted with an increased risk of developing breast cancer.

“My belief is that cancer comes from inside you and so much of it has to do with the environment of your body,” Etheridge told a reporter last week.

Recent critical research finally tells us lots about why 240,000 women in the U.S. currently develop invasive breast cancer each year. This same research offers all women logical, healthy and inexpensive ways to stop most breast cancer before it can start.

  •  Increasing your vitamin D3 blood serum levels
  • Avoiding birth control and other progestin-based drugs

are two easy and  incredibly significant ways to actually block most breast cancer from taking root.

How does vitamin D3 stop breast cancer before it starts?

The DINOMIT theroy of breast cancer, developed by epidemiologist Cedric Garland, during three decades of research at the University of California, San Diego, shows how sufficient levels of vitamin D3 in the body enable breast cells to interlock with one another, forming a protective shield when a single breast cell becomes mutated. These interlocking cells block cancerous tumors from forming.

 How or why can  all contraceptive drugs, including Yaz, Seasonale, and the Mirena IUD, along with  Prempro, (used by  post- menopausal women),  and progestin-based fertility drugs,  also cause breast cancer?

Ask Josef Penninger! This young Viennese geneticist, founder of the Institute of Molecular Biology of the Austrian Academy of Science, recently discovered that progestin can activate the protein RANKL in breast cells; RANKL can then mutate a cell and can exponentially increase cell duplication of a single breast cancer cell, causing breast tumors to form. This dramatic finding won Penninger a $7.4 million Innovators Award from the Department of Defense’s Breast Cancer Research Fund last fall.

But even today, most medical centers, along with our wealthiest breast cancer foundations, Susan G. Komen For the Cure, Avon Walk for Women, and the American Cancer Society, continue to warn women, “We really don’t know what causes breast cancer.”

Using their huge misinformation campaigns, these well-heeled breast cancer giants, financed largely by pharmaceutical and radiology companies, generate more fear, followed by more breast amputations, and more breast reconstructions each year.

Enter Angelina Jolie and the 100,000 other women in the U.S. who had one or both breasts amputated last year.  These individuals have usually been diagnosed with one of three conditions:

  • invasive breast cancer
  • some type of non cancerous breast condition
  • a positive test  for being born with  a mutated “cancer fix-it” gene…called BRCA 1 or BRCA 2

Sadly, oncologists, mammogram clinics and major cancer centers rarely talk to women about increasing their vitamin D3 blood serum level to 50-80 ng/ml, and avoiding any progestin-based drugs as options that can also stop the disease before it starts.  Why not?

  • Most physicians don’t follow the newest research on the protective effects of vitamin D3; nor do most doctors follow the new research that explains how progestin causes breast cancer. Stopping breast cancer before it starts, after all, is rarely their job.
  • Also, most physicians believe that the well-publicized “national” Vitamin D3 reports, conducted by the Institute of Medicine during the past few years, are valid. These doctors do not realize that the Institute’s study panels, which continue to find Vitamin D3 useless in preventing breast cancer, are designed and funded by pharmaceutical company interests.
  • Meanwhile, most physicians believe that contraceptive pills and patches and other progestin-based drugs do not   “significantly” increase breast cancer rates.  However, this statement, still published by pharmaceutical companies and the American Cancer Society, is contradicted by 97% of studies done on the subject in the past decade.
  • Also … and very sadly…most physicians say that their liability insurance may not cover their practice if they recommend increasing vitamin D3 and stopping progestin drugs, instead of advocating surgery, radiation (mammograms)  or pharmaceutical drugs as the best ways for a client to stop breast cancer before it starts.
  • Finally …most oncologists don’t make much money recommending more vitamin D3 supplements and increasing vitamin D3 by limited safe tanning, or by having a client stop using progestin drugs. Don’t forget…cancer specialists make a good portion of their annual income prescribing radiation, drugs and/or surgeries.

No wonder most women, including Jolie, remain fearful when they hear they are at high risk to develop breast cancer. Double breast amputations are even more likely if the woman’s health insurance will pay for these new perky breasts, with nipple-saving surgery that also offer a firm bra-free existence until the silicone or saline implants need to be  replaced  every ten years.

However, for more and more women, including Melissa Etheridge and myself,  avoiding progestin drugs, taking vitamin D3 supplements, getting more D3-producing UVB rays from safe (very limited)  indoor and outdoor tanning, and making other lifestyle and dietary changes, create a much gentler,  happier and better-informed wellness choice.

                          **************************************

References:
Increasing incidence of invasive breast cancer in U.S
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/2/prweb10453661.htm
 
Low vitamin D3 linked to increased breast cancer incidence
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/may/16/science/sci-breast16
 
DINOMIT theory of cancer (how/why increased levels of Vitamin D3 block tumor growth) 
http://naturalhealthperspective.com/supplements/dinomit-model-cancer.html

Institute of Medicine’s corporate-financed reports on vitamin D3 and breast cancer 
http://experiencelife.com/article/the-vitamin-d-debate/
http://holisticprimarycare.net/blog/erik-goldman-blog/1051-the-great-d-bate-integrative-physicians-respond-to-ioms-new-vitamin-d-guidelines

Birth Control Drugs: Learn the terrible truth, VOl 1, Busting Breast Cancer Ebook Series, Susan Wadia-Ells
http://www.amazon.com/Busting-Breast-Cancer-Terrible-ebook/dp/B00AB6AM2Y

Penninger given $7.4 million Innovators Award for understanding how progestin causes/accelerates breast cancer
http://www.imba.oeaw.ac.at/news-media/news/news/breast-cancer-advance-wins-imba-74m-us-award/
 
Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program
http://cdmrp.army.mil/pubs/press/2013/13bcrppreann.shtml
 
Melissa Etheridge is interviewed by The Washington Blade, June 13, 2013 
https://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/06/13/rippin-tearin-strippin/

 

 

 

 

“Think Beyond Pink” Radio interviews Busting Breast Cancer

Think Beyond Pink talk show host, Linda Bamber

interviews BBC’s Susan Wadia-Ells

WebTalkRadio.net Host

Listen to the Dec 10, 2012 Interview

Learn about the Busting Breast Cancer : 7 Simple Steps Ebook Series

Listen to great interview and learn how you can make some  lifestyle changes that can  significantly  lower your individual breast cancer risk today. tomorrow and in the coming years.  These changes are also  simple, inexpensive and healthy!!!

Learn why so few foundations and government agencies are interested in teaching women  actual research-based ways to stop breast cancer before it starts.

Women need Prevention not Profits!

Listen to the Dec 10, 2012 Interview NOW!!!